Download E-books Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture PDF

By Marvin Harris

Why are human nutrition conduct so different? Why do americans cringe on the considered puppy meat? Jews and Moslems, beef? Hindus, pork? Why do Asians abhor milk? In reliable to Eat, bestselling writer Marvin Harris leads readers on an informative detective experience to unravel the world's significant nutrition puzzles. He explains the variety of the world's gastronomic customs, demonstrating that what seem firstly look to be irrational nutrition tastes end up relatively to were formed via sensible, or financial, or political necessity. moreover, his shrewdpermanent and lively therapy sheds knowledge on such themes as why there was an explosion in quick foodstuff, why background shows that it is "bad" to consume humans yet "good" to kill them, and why young children universally reject spinach. Good to Eat is greater than an highbrow event in nutrients for proposal. it's a hugely readable, scientifically exact, and engaging paintings that demystifies the factors of myriad human cultural differences.

identify of comparable curiosity additionally on hand from Waveland Press: Kahn, Always Hungry, by no means grasping: meals and the Expression of Gender in a Melanesian Society (ISBN 9780881337761).

Show description

Read Online or Download Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture PDF

Best Anthropology books

Rules and Meanings: The Anthropology of Everyday Knowledge (Penguin modern sociology readings)

First released in 1973, principles and Meanings is an anthology of works that shape a part of Mary Douglas' fight to plot an anthropological modernism conducive to her competition to seemingly modernizing developments in modern society. the gathering comprises works by means of Wittgenstein, Schutz, Husserl, Hertz and different continentals.

How Traditions Live and Die (Foundations of Human Interaction)

Of the whole lot we do and say, so much will not be repeated or reproduced. from time to time, despite the fact that, an idea or a tradition generates a series of transmission that covers extra distance via area and time than anyone individual ever might. What makes such transmission chains attainable? for 2 centuries, the dominant view (from psychology to anthropology) was once that people owe their cultural prosperity to their powers of imitation.

Inside Marketing: Practices, Ideologies, Devices

The intensification of promoting actions in recent times has led the general public to develop into even more conscious of its position as shoppers. but, the elevated visibility of promoting fabrics and linked messages in way of life is against this with the customarily little understood internal workings of the selling career itself, regardless of the common popularity of sellers as key brokers in shaping the face of worldwide capitalism.

Additional info for Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture

Show sample text content

The women should not able to endure offspring and the men should not able to copulate till six years of age . To sluggish issues down extra, the men have a once-a­ 12 months rutting season (during which they emit an offensive odor), and gestation takes one year. Neither camel meat nor camel milk may well ever have constituted a good portion of the an­ cient Isarelites' nutrients provide. these few Israelites resembling Abraham and Joseph who owned camels may have used them strictly as a method of delivery for crossing the barren region. This interpretation profits energy from the Moslem reputation of camel meat. within the Koran, beef is particularly prohibited whereas camel flesh is particularly allowed. the full lifestyle of M o­ hammed's desert-dwelling, pastoral Bedouin fans was once according to the camel. The camel used to be their major resource of delivery and their major resource of animal nutrients, essentially within the type of camel milk. whereas camel meat used to be now not day-by-day fare, the Bedouin have been frequently pressured to slaughter pack animals in the course of their barren region jour­ neys as emergency rations while their ordinary provides of meals have been depleted. An Islam that banned camel flesh may by no means became a superb international faith . it's going to were not able to overcome the Arabian heartlands, to release its assault opposed to the Byzantine and Persian empires, and to go the Sahara to the Sahel and West Africa. If the Levite clergymen have been attempting to rationalize and codify nutritional legislation , so much of which had a foundation in preexisting well known trust and perform , they wanted a taxonomic precept which attached the present styles of choice and avoidance right into a comprehen­ sive cognitive and theological approach. The preexisting ban on THE ABOMINABLE PIC eighty one camel meat made it very unlikely to take advantage of cud-chewing because the sole taxonomic precept for opting for land vertebrates that have been reliable to consume. They wanted one other criterion to exclude camels. And this was once how "split hooves" acquired into the image . Camels have conspicuously various ft from farm animals, sheep, or goats . they've got break up ft rather than cut up hooves . So the monks of Leviticus additional "parts the hoof" to "chews the cud" to make camels undesirable to devour. The misclassification of the hare and shiiphiin means that those animals weren't renowned to the codifiers. The authors of Leviticus have been correct in regards to the feet-hares have paws and Hyrax (and Procavia) have tiny hooves, 3 at the entrance leg and 5 at the rear leg. yet they have been flawed concerning the cud-chewing-perhaps simply because hares and shiiphiin have their mouths in consistent movement . as soon as the main of utilizing toes to differentiate among fit to be eaten and inedible flesh was once confirmed, the pig couldn't be banned just by pointing to its nonruminant nature. either its cud-chew­ ing prestige and the anatomy of its toes needed to be thought of, although the pig's failure to bite the cud was once its decisive illness. This, then, is my conception of why the formulation for forbidden vertebrate land animals was once elaborated past the mere absence of cud-chewing.

Rated 4.18 of 5 – based on 37 votes